Study Finds Better Outcomes for Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries than Traditional FFS Medicare
Among others, the study found that there were better outcomes in MA than FFS for all populations analyzed in 17 of 22 clinical quality of care measures.

January 3, 2021 – In December 2020, Better Medicare Alliance’s (BMA) Center for Innovation in Medicare released a report, Positive Outcomes for High-Need, High-Cost Beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage Compared to Traditional Fee-For-Service Medicare. The study south to analyze if Medicare Advantage’s (MA) integrated care and care management lead to better results for beneficiaries most at risk of poor results. It examined the range of outcomes for high-need, high-cost beneficiaries under Medicare Advantage and compared those to those under Traditional Fee-For-Service (FFS) Medicare.
Among others, the study found that there were better outcomes in MA than FFS for all populations analyzed in 17 of 22 clinical quality of care measures. It also found similar positive results for utilization of care, quality of care, and costs of care, which suggests that MA care management programs help lead to a better quality of care and lower cost of care for at-risk beneficiaries.
Click here to read the full report from Better Medicare Alliance’s (BMA) Center for Innovation in Medicare.

The VBP Blog is a comprehensive resource for all things related to value-based payments. We provide up to date news, informative webinars, and relevant blogs in the VBP sphere to help your organization find success.
Get even more VBP insights on LinkedIn & Twitter
More Trending Topics:

Nebraska Eliminates Developmental Disabilities Waitlist Through State-Funded Service Expansion
Nebraska ends its I/DD waitlist ahead of schedule, expanding access to Medicaid-funded home- and community-based services through $18 million in state and federal funding.

Pioneer ACO Model – A First Step Toward Accountable, Coordinated Care
As one of CMMI’s earliest initiatives, the Pioneer ACO Model helped define what accountable care could look like. We explore what worked, what didn’t, and where the model leads us next.

Maryland’s TCOC Model – A Blueprint for Whole-Person Value-Based Care
Maryland’s Total Cost of Care model offers one of the clearest examples of value-based payment success at scale. We unpack the model’s structure, impact, and lessons for LTSS.

CMS Proposes 6.4% Cut to Medicare Home Health Payments for 2026
CMS proposes a 6.4% reduction in Medicare payments to home health agencies for 2026, raising concerns about access to care and financial stability in the sector.

Exploring Success of CMMI Value-Based Payment Models: A New Series on Innovation and Impact
From bundled payments to accountable care, CMMI models are reshaping healthcare delivery. This series explores which ones delivered results, and what it means for value-based care in the future.

Unplanned Long-Term Care Costs Threaten U.S. Retirement Security
New analysis warns that long-term care expenses pose serious risks to retirement security, particularly for single women and Baby Boomers.